AJ wrote:Again where are you reading this???
I have read the report and do not understand how you have come up with that conclusion!!!
Recommendations
107. I recommend:
(i) that no modifications be made to paragraph 8.49 in the RRD in
response to these objections.
(ii) that paragraph 8.50 be modified by deleting the text of the RDD
after the words ‘Holiday destination that is Margate” and replacing it
with the following:
“8.50 The Council’s preference will be for Dreamland to
continue to provide a core leisure facility to underpin the holiday
destination that is Margate. There is a presumption in favour of
retaining the listed Cinema and Scenic Railway on site. The Council
acknowledges that for there to be investment, part of the site may
have to be redeveloped for non-leisure related uses that are
compatible with continued use as an amusement park. However, it
is important that revenue from such development is reinvested into
the provision and improvement of facilities so that the attractiveness
and viability of the park is maintained. To develop part of the site
and not reinvest into the park is not acceptable. This would make
the amusement park less viable and would ultimately lead to the loss
of the whole attraction and therefore this important asset. The
Council will therefore negotiate a legal agreement that will tie the
development of part of the site with the improvements to the
amusement park.”