I haven't posted for a while, but just wanted to say that I do not support 'Plan B'. It looks, on the surface at least, to be a sellout and to go against the findings of the independent inspector and possible the campaign itself, in that the fact that provision has been given for the redevelopment of some areas of the park, could be offering weaponry that could backfire on the campaign.
The original 'I dream of Dreamland' plan was first class and based on the truth that anyone objective can see, which is that a quality, well-managed attraction as a centrepiece to a seaside town brings visitors, resulting in further investment throughtout the town. Whilst it's commendable to base a theme park around its heritage, the net result, in my opinion, is unimaginative and boring when compared to the original vision and may not bring in visitors in sufficient numbers. With the exception of the Scenic, it just isn't a very balanced looking park and is targetted at a very limited potential visitorship. It offers little when compared to Thorpe Park, Chessington, LegoLand or Adventure Island.
Margate is a beautiful seaside resort with miles of sandy beaches in easy reach of Kent and London, but simply does not have a reason for anyone to visit it. Southend-on-Sea has this reason with Adventure Island and with the addition of the Gerstlauer Eurofighter this season, has more reason than ever. 'Plan B' appears to lack the vision and excitement required to turn things around and I fear it could result in failure, that in turn could lead to complete redevelopment of the land.
That said, if partial redevelopment really is an inevitability, I feel 'Plan B' would be more effective if it were to contain a smaller version of the 'I Dream of Dreamland' plans - with no watering down of the excitement or diversity of the ride line-up or vision contained within it.
I feel the campaign has done sterling work and do not wish to criticise anyone involved, I just feel that the this is not the best way forward.
