Well, I did gee a few folk up to ensure the CO would get on site with some sort of urgency, but I wouldn't think this is an easy one for listing, for a number of reasons which I won't go into in public.
Most useful is the sixth months' grace. A preservation order isn't simple either, it can cost the local authority a great deal of money in the end, which is why these are not often used.
However, who was it actually did the demolition? Who were they working for?
By the way - the US has no system of genuine heritage protection at all. Ours is far from perfect, and it's ponderous and hedged about with all manner of get out clauses and legal difficulties, but we do have some.
Inclusion of these could have pushed protection of the entire site years ago.
I think you have a very vague idea of what our heritage protection policies can achieve!
I have a 'positive' response to most things Dave about Dreamland - but I'm also a realist. There are no magic wands to be waved. It's a long hard slog.