Redevelopment Can Now Move Forward

[Gary]

Dear Robert,

Thank you for your insights..

Thank you for taking time out to put forward your points of view.

Thank you for allowing us all the unique opportunity to attempt to understand one who is so vehemenently opposed to Saving Dreamland.

Thank you for sharing your mindset:

I do now seriously feel that the "Save Dreamland Campaign" is now having a very negative impact on Dreamland and wanting to stand in the way of every opportunity that is put forward to save Dreamland by redeveloping it.

I secretly smile and applaud the way that you have attempted to make The Save Dreamland Campaign appear to be the architects of Dreamland's own downfall..

..Clever one that.

There was a time I honestly thought you had something worthwhile to say.

Regards,

Gary

[Cheryl]

I'm waiting patiently, anticipating an answer to Dave's question. Come on Bob you claim you are in the know. How can you expect to be taken seriously when you continually dodge valid questions?

[Bob]

Dear Robert,

Thank you for your insights..

Thank you for taking time out to put forward your points of view.

Thank you for allowing us all the unique opportunity to attempt to understand one who is so vehemenently opposed to Saving Dreamland.

Thank you for sharing your mindset:

I do now seriously feel that the "Save Dreamland Campaign" is now having a very negative impact on Dreamland and wanting to stand in the way of every opportunity that is put forward to save Dreamland by redeveloping it.

I secretly smile and applaud the way that you have attempted to make The Save Dreamland Campaign appear to be the architects of Dreamland's own downfall..

..Clever one that.

There was a time I honestly thought you had something worthwhile to say.

Regards,

Gary

The Campaign is now really standing in the way of the redevelopment. Option C gives you pretty much what you were campaigning for, yet you are objecting to it. It seems totally illogical.

[David Ellis]

The Campaign is now really standing in the way of the redevelopment. Option C gives you pretty much what you were campaigning for, yet you are objecting to it. It seems totally illogical.

Bob - we have stated in no uncertain terms why we are campaigning, and why option C does not give long-term certainty to the park being run as a thriving amusement park.

We have also asked you direct questions which, to date, you have not even been polite enough to answer.

Please can we just agree to disagree, and leave it there?

David.

[marky.com]

The Campaign is now really standing in the way of the redevelopment. Option C gives you pretty much what you were campaigning for, yet you are objecting to it. It seems totally illogical.

I think what you mean to say is that the campaign is standing in the way of the owner's utterly obvious deliberate campaign to redevelop most of the land, place a temporary travelling fair (whilst doing everything possible to make sure it is not promoted and run badly) on the remainder of the land, then use it's inevitable lack of success as an excuse to then redevelop that land too a few years down the line. Making a good buck or two in the process, whilst sending Margate into an irreversable decline.

Thank God for that too!

[Neil]

The Campaign is now really standing in the way of the redevelopment. Option C gives you pretty much what you were campaigning for, yet you are objecting to it. It seems totally illogical.

Bob, I really admire your talent in the department of arse speaking. Daves question was not actually "do we want to keep Dreamland an amusement park" but in your plans "does the operator get sold a portion of the land at the going price for an amusement park or will they get a short term lease?"

A LITTLE MORE MOUTH AND A LITTLE LESS A.RSE! Moreover I've asked you loads of questions Bob that you haven't answered. I might start a new topic "the questions Bob won't answer!".