MTCRC - CPO Objection - Their plans for the site

The Save Dreamland Campaign was launched by Joyland Books in January 2003 and is now supported by several thousand people. This is the place to discuss all aspects of saving Margate's famous amusement park and its iconic , Grade II listed Scenic Railway, Britain's oldest roller coaster.

Moderators: dave771, porf, Sarah

MTCRC - CPO Objection - Their plans for the site

Postby porf » 11 Dec 2011, 11:09

In this week's "ThisIsKent", MTCRC put forward some of their plans for the Dreamland site and why they shouldn't have it CPO'd.

http://www.thisiskent.co.uk/Dreamland-bosses-fight-fun-park/story-14092197-detail/story.html

I think there's been a typo in the article heading as I think it should read "Dreamland Bosses fight for large housing estate around all the stuff we wish wasn't there"

Anything good seems to match up with the Trust's plan, with other ideas leading to a site that in my opinion wouldn't attract people to Margate as a tourist attraction.

The comparison between the 1st and 3rd photo included in the article is also interesting, one being the artistic impression view to sell the scheme and the other being far more likely to be the reality of bland block housing too close to a series of listed structures.
Paul Freeman
User avatar
porf
Site Admin
 
Posts: 504
Joined: 04 Jun 2003, 20:35
Location: London

Postby Nick Evans » 11 Dec 2011, 22:22

Wholeheartedly agree with PORF on this one. I hope I'm right in saying this is nothing more than a blatant spoiler and nothing to do with doing the right thing. If they were sincere about their plan, why didn't MTCRC unveil these plans ages ago before it got to this stage? The Trust would still have objected I'm sure on the grounds the houses are too close to the rides. Certainly this wouldn't stand as a tourist attraction helping regenerate Margate.
Nick Evans
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 30 Dec 2003, 21:32

Postby porterm » 12 Dec 2011, 02:38

I totally agree with your sentiments about this news story. It reminds me of the former USA park, Whalom Park, whose campaigners coined the classic phrase "coasters not condos".

What I find particularly amazing is that MTCRC have already had nearly nine years to implement some preservation works towards the Dreamland site's listed buildings and have failed miserably. I'm sure many others here have similar feelings. I reckon this article is possibly a last ditch attempt to try to salvage what they can from this ongoing saga.

They also appear to imply that they have the only method to ensure that all the park's listed structures get the fullest restoration action. I believe that the Dreamland Trust's Phase 1 and 2 processes will also provide a complete overhaul, and it could surely allow patrons and interested parties to offer further monetary donations to fund future phases, as required.

Martin
porterm
 
Posts: 732
Joined: 10 Feb 2003, 03:13
Location: Maidstone, Kent

Postby barcrest » 12 Dec 2011, 10:38

What a crock, the sooner the CPO is actioned the better.
barcrest
 
Posts: 61
Joined: 20 Aug 2004, 17:48

Postby DaveD » 12 Dec 2011, 15:28

While it does smack of last-minute desperation, these plans are quite worrying.

With the Turner up and running and the Queen visiting, TDC maybe more open-minded to a clone-town "boulevard" type of thing in keeping with it's regeneration than it was?

Saying that, I think things have moved on a great deal since the days of Toby Hunter so I doubt anything will come of this.


DD
DaveD
 
Posts: 120
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 16:25
Location: Gillingham, Kent

Postby Bob » 10 Jan 2012, 10:34

There plan looks to be very viable unlike the Dreamland Trusts plan. It also fulfills the requirement for affordable housing and also provides a lot of other beneficial facilities to the town

Overall the MTCRC is fully viavble, fully costed and needs no public subsidy and provides much needed affordable housing. It would be very difficult on the basis of this to make a case for a CPO
Bob
 
Posts: 509
Joined: 30 Nov 2003, 21:21

Postby Zoidstar » 10 Jan 2012, 15:49

Bob wrote:There plan looks to be very viable unlike the Dreamland Trusts plan. It also fulfills the requirement for affordable housing and also provides a lot of other beneficial facilities to the town

Overall the MTCRC is fully viavble, fully costed and needs no public subsidy and provides much needed affordable housing. It would be very difficult on the basis of this to make a case for a CPO


IF it was that viable why have they not started work on it, have they even submitted a planning application if its so viable?
Zoid on!
Zoidstar
 
Posts: 296
Joined: 01 Jul 2003, 12:12

Postby porf » 10 Jan 2012, 16:56

Bit late for that bit of astroturfing isn't it Bob?

I think I'll just wait and see how this week pans out!
Paul Freeman
User avatar
porf
Site Admin
 
Posts: 504
Joined: 04 Jun 2003, 20:35
Location: London

Dreamland Trust Objection to Tesco/Arlington House developme

Postby John Humphrey » 10 Jan 2012, 17:02

Chris Miele used to be with English Heritage!

In addition, this may be controversial but some of us are very angry with Tesco over a recent decision it has made over which charities it will support. A Tesco on the Arlington site will lose the company even more good will. Why not redevelop their Cliftonville (Northdown Road) site into a major store? Then, if they still feel that they should have a presence in Margate proper, they should open a Metro store in (for example) the old Woolworth store.
John Humphrey
John Humphrey
 
Posts: 21
Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 16:19

Postby Peet » 10 Jan 2012, 21:53

Bob wrote:There plan looks to be very viable unlike the Dreamland Trusts plan. It also fulfills the requirement for affordable housing and also provides a lot of other beneficial facilities to the town

Overall the MTCRC is fully viavble, fully costed and needs no public subsidy and provides much needed affordable housing. It would be very difficult on the basis of this to make a case for a CPO


The grammar in this post is poor and the content worse. One scheme achieves the aim of making a tidy profit for a company, the other brings a world first attraction to Margate which will bring visitors from miles around for many years. Let's just hope the correct decision is made.
Peet
 
Posts: 93
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 13:48
Location: London

Bob's affordable housing

Postby RICO » 11 Jan 2012, 13:55

Am I missing something....

Margate and Thanet needs jobs and tourism (i.e. wealth creation) not housing. Margate's decline is due to an imbalance between jobs and existing relatively cheap housing (which Thanet already has an abundance of relative to many parts of the UK). Local schools and social services are already struggling. We need to be able to cope with those who live here first and manage existing housing stock better. Building more houses suggests we'll just make things worse.

Even if Margate needed more housing, why build more houses on a prime sea front location which, if/ when Margate succeeds, will end up being a prime location for a holiday home, well out of the reach of affordable housing market.

I'm in favour of the heritage site not only because of the better job/ tourist/ redevelopment of Margate potential, but also because I believe this is the best solution. The issue should be more about ensuring we end up with a quality heritage site in line with parks such as Tivoli, Grona Lund and Liseberg rather than cheap second rate Alton Towers.

MTCRC should do the honourable thing and step aside and stop wasting more money....
RICO
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 11 Jan 2012, 12:56
Location: Broadstairs

Postby vince69619 » 11 Jan 2012, 18:06

Now that's what I call a first post. Welcome RICO.

Vince.
User avatar
vince69619
 
Posts: 457
Joined: 06 Aug 2004, 11:42
Location: Reading

Postby Jim Douglas Jr. » 11 Jan 2012, 19:36

Rico rocks.

Bob, as usual, is being a troll.
I thought he died from over-eating in front of his computer.

Here's the last known photo taken of poor Bob.
Image
Kyle & Herbie the Love Bug lll53
User avatar
Jim Douglas Jr.
 
Posts: 1182
Joined: 15 Mar 2006, 19:49
Location: San Francisco, California, USA

Re: Dreamland Trust Objection to Tesco/Arlington House devel

Postby Bob » 11 Jan 2012, 20:11

John Humphrey wrote:Chris Miele used to be with English Heritage!

In addition, this may be controversial but some of us are very angry with Tesco over a recent decision it has made over which charities it will support. A Tesco on the Arlington site will lose the company even more good will. Why not redevelop their Cliftonville (Northdown Road) site into a major store? Then, if they still feel that they should have a presence in Margate proper, they should open a Metro store in (for example) the old Woolworth store.


It does meet the local develepoment plan for Margate which is for Supermarkets to be located in Town centre sites
Bob
 
Posts: 509
Joined: 30 Nov 2003, 21:21

Postby EAS » 11 Jan 2012, 22:44

Miele used to work for EH... he's been on The Dark Side for a long time now though.



http://www.whtimes.co.uk/news/tesco_pla ... _1_1175110


A Tesco refused...
Ferengi Rules of Acquisition: Rule 76. Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies.
User avatar
EAS
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: 18 Sep 2006, 09:09
Location: North

Next

Return to Save Dreamland Campaign Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests