Let's distill the argument to its fundamentals.
The conglomeration of owners of Dreamland are businessmen. They are not interested in the welfare of Margate. The money invested by Mr Hunter is, firstly not a benevolent gift from Mr Hunter's personal piggy bank; he presumably has investors who expect a return on their money.
The council have been weak in believing what the previous owner and the current amalgam say. The picture of Dreamland as a failure has been engineered and I for one believe I have the right to point this out.
Miller and others would have paid a fair price for this land as an amusement park. The council's prevarication and eventual 'crumbling' in their u turn on policy has enabled financial vultures to gather around the corpse; the price for the land has therefore theoretically increased. It is the council that are at fault. Mr Hunter only wants to maximise profits for his investors and in that he is right. It does not give him or Bob the right to try and silence others who could see what was going on and still see what is going on. Ripping the heart out of a town for profit is not an old idea. I just wish the council had seen through the ruse and stopped the rot by insisting on its original usage. I suspect Mr Hunter wouldn't be involved then.
Tourists would come back as they do elsewhere despite what Bob says. He's not the only one with knowledge of profit and loss accounts despite his attempts to prove so. And his most recent discussion on specific plans for specific areas of the site that aren't really are wonderful. I've lost track - gyms, musuems, potholes...... People don't go to Margate anymore because one of the main reasons to go has been removed. That could be why the hotels are closing. just a thought Bob
Taffy

