Bob wrote:vince69619 wrote:I thought I would start the thanks to our defrosting campainers who have been on the streets (won't ask how much they earned).
The results at 100:1 show that the people of Margate (that wanted to express an opinion) back up the campaign's stance on the park. And I can tell any doubters that if any of the public were against our stance, they would have let them know.
So there you go, take out the meddling out of towners and the result is the same. People want Dreamland to stay Dreamland.
Vince. (Non hairy! Fairly thin on top actually :shock: )
Dreamland is no longer viable. This is beyond any reasonable doubt. We have demonstrated this to TDC and they have accepted the evidence. Any redevelopment of Dreamland has to be on a commercial basis and this is the approach currently being taken. Whilst the exact amount of the site given over to an amusement park is not yet finalised it will be no more then 60% but at this stage could be as low as 30% it alll depends on the final business plan figures.
Hi All
I think we would all agree that in the hands of the current owners Dreamland is not viable (because thay dont want it to be), if thay had to sell the land as an amusement park thay are not going to get the sums of money thay want, its therefore in there intrests to make it look like its not viable.
However as stated by Nick evedence to the contrey has been give from other partys who are not going to invest money of the amounts needesd to bring Dreamland up to scratch.
Bob can say its not viable until he is blue in the face but i would tend to go with Phillip Miller than Bob and his croneys any day, it is paliny obvious that thay want to make as much money from the site as possible and thay cannot do that if its an Amusement Park.
CLiff C